When the general contractor moves a milestone, your crew plan and your production targets move with it. Automatically. And every field update becomes part of a record you can stand behind.
Early access for trade contractors. No sales call, no spam.
Thanks — you're on the list. We'll be in touch before the first pilots start.
You commit to production rates at bid, plan the schedule somewhere else, and staff the crews somewhere else again. Nothing talks to anything until closeout.
Every trade contractor plans the same three things. In most companies those plans live in three unrelated tools, so a change in one never reaches the others. Sightline makes them a single loop.
Built from your takeoff, benchmarked against real production rates, and diffed against every GC revision as it lands.
A demand curve derived from that schedule — never hand-loaded. Compress the work and the curve reshapes itself.
Installed rates measured against benchmark while the job is live, flagged in both directions — not reviewed at closeout.
Most tools own one leg of this. Only a platform that holds all three can close the loop.
Hand Sightline a takeoff and it builds the baseline — tasks, durations, sequence — from real production rates, then hands it to you to edit before anything is committed. Hand it the GC's PDF and it tells you what moved since the last revision, with the slips that touch your scope sorted to the top.
You stop finding out at the coordination meeting.
Your labour demand curve is computed from live schedule data, so it is never stale. See demand against real supply across every job at once — and spot the week you go short while there's still time to do something about it.
When a GC revision compresses six weeks of work into four, the curve already knows. Nobody re-keys a forecast.
Open any job and every week is editable against the derived number. Change one and it's stamped with who changed it and why — and one click puts it back.
Apprentice ratio and supervision span checked live against your configured limits. Out of band, it flags. It never stops you staffing the job.
Where demand outruns supply, Sightline proposes a labour request with the gap already counted. It never fills one by itself — someone accepts or dismisses it.
Bench, loans and transfers are real records with authority checked and overlaps barred outright — not a verbal arrangement that surfaces on a timesheet three weeks later.
Installed rates are measured against benchmark as the work happens and flagged in both directions — running slow is the contractually dangerous one, running fast often means the estimate was wrong or your float is being squeezed.
Those rates roll up across every project into a production history that belongs to you: per cost code, with thin data honestly marked rather than quietly averaged.
Any scheduling tool will tell you what one job needs. None of them can tell you whether you have the people for all of them — plus the three you're bidding — in October. That question gets answered on a whiteboard, from memory, by whoever has been there longest.
Sightline holds the schedule for every project you're running, so it can total them. One demand curve across the whole company, broken out by classification, with your real supply laid over it — net of time off, loans, and assignments already made.
Work you haven't won yet contributes its own demand, held separately so it never inflates committed capacity. You can see what happens if you win it. You're never staffing against it by accident.
That's the view that decides whether you hire, call the hall, sub it out, or turn the work down.
Who's free this week anywhere in the company — not who's free on the job you happen to have open. Nobody sits idle on one site while another runs short.
Loans and transfers with a lending authority, a return date and overlaps barred outright. The move is a record, not a phone call somebody half remembers.
Where the company comes up short, Sightline proposes a request with the gap counted — to fill off the bench, out of the hiring hall, merit, or a sub.
A capacity audit across the portfolio shows which jobs have a baseline, which have a current forecast, and which have quietly gone out of date.
Next Group the same curve by your dimensions — hiring hall, superintendent, work area, or any tag you define — so the question you ask is the chart you get.
This only works if every job is in it. Which is exactly why we don't charge you per job.
Sightline isn't a claims tool. It's a planning tool that happens to leave a defensible trail behind it — so the documentation is already built by the time you need it, instead of reconstructed under pressure after the window has closed.
A reviewer has two options: approve, or send it back with a reason. There is no approver override. Nobody's number gets quietly rewritten by someone who wasn't there.
Contract notice obligations turn on when you became reasonably aware. Sightline logs and timestamps a slip the day it appears, whether or not it's big enough to act on.
Sightline drafts a delay notice from confirmed evidence and freezes it as a PDF on your letterhead, ready to issue. A human authorises every transmission. No exceptions.
"Marcus reported 260 LF" is a stronger artefact than "Marcus reported 300, and the office corrected it to 260." — Why Sightline has no approver override
Progress capture runs in the browser on the phone already in your foreman's pocket — no app store, no install, no IT project. It keeps working with no connection and syncs itself the moment there's signal again.
One picture of the job, cut five ways for the five people who need it.
Tomorrow's crew list is right, and logging today's progress takes under a minute — signal or not.
Where your people are, where they should be, and who's on the bench this week.
The GC moved something. What did it cost you, and can you prove it?
How many hands you need in week 14, across every job, before you're short.
Which jobs are bleeding, which estimates were wrong, and whether the team is actually using this.
You shouldn't have to decide who deserves a login. Pricing scales with your business, not your headcount — published, not quoted.
Foreman to executive, no seat counting. A tool half the company can't open is worth nothing.
Leave jobs out and the labour curve is wrong and the benchmarks are thin. So we don't charge you per job.
Published pricing at launch.
We'd rather tell you that plainly than dress it up. Here's exactly where this stands.
Scheduling, GC schedule analysis, offline field capture, company labour planning and production tracking. Running today, not a mockup.
No pilots, no customers, nothing we can point at and call proof. That's the honest position, and it's exactly what we're looking to change.
Run real work through it and tell us where it breaks. What you need next is what gets built next — while there are few enough of you for that to mean something.
Bring two revisions of a GC schedule from one of your own jobs. We'll show you exactly what changed between them — and what it cost you.
We're opening a small number of pilots with trade contractors. Early partners shape what gets built next.
Thanks — you're on the list. We'll be in touch before the first pilots start.